Nongovernment reforestation, or tree planting activities conducted by
private land owners, organizations, and citizens, has been declining despite
the introduction of the National Greening Program (NGP). Launched in 2011, the
NGP is a priority program of the government that aims to rehabilitate the
forests and, at the same time, to reduce poverty; promote food security,
environmental stability, and biodiversity conservation; and enhance climate
change mitigation and adaptation.
According to a study by state
think tank Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), nongovernment
reforestation contributed only about 2 percent of the total reforested area in
2013. This figure is much lower compared to the 56 percent of total area that
private entities and individuals reforested in 2005.
PIDS Senior Research Fellow
Danilo Israel, author of the study, noted that nongovernment reforestation
contributed a large share in reforestation before the early 2000s. However, at
the turn of the millennium, its contributions to reforestation efforts dropped
to 20 percent from 39 percent in the 1990s. It continued to decline to 6.94
percent in the early 2011, just as the government launched the NGP.
Nongovernment reforestation
occurs through agreements between the government and various nongovernment
groups, such as forest agriculture communities, indigenous peoples, and
industry entities and private groups. Nongovernment reforestation was driven by
programs like community-based forest management agreements, integrated forest
management agreements, socialized industrial forest management agreements, tree
farm lease agreements, agroforestry farm lease agreements, industrial tree
plantation lease agreements, industrial tree plantations, and Presidential
Decree 1153 that requires every Filipino citizen to plant one tree every month
for five consecutive years.
From the 1960s to the 1990s,
the country suffered massive forest cover and biodiversity loss due to
unchecked exploitation. Prior to the 1970s, the country has always relied on
government programs to manage its forest resources. To mobilize better forestry
protection and management, the government passed laws that would grant rights
and responsibilities to nongovernment entities and enjoin them to the cause.
A good way to revive the
contribution rate of nongovernment reforestation is to work through private
landowners, organizations, and citizens. According to Israel, “private
reforestation has been the main driver of nongovernment reforestation. However,
it faces many obstacles and is generally left out of large-scale government
reforestation programs like the NGP.”
Mr. Israel recommends that since private reforestation has
outperformed other nongovernment reforestation programs in the past, the
country’s policymakers should look into optimizing its performance by
addressing institutional, production, and marketing issues that stand in the
way.
“Harmonization of laws and
regulations is a good place to start. Developing a coherent Sustainable Forest
Management Act and Comprehensive Land Use Act would reassure private investors
that their interests are protected. Right now, part of the institutional issues
faced by private reforestation entities is the inconsistencies in relevant laws
and policies, the lack of government-assisted programs, and complications
related to security of land tenure and contesting land claims,” Mr. Israel
explained.
Moreover, Mr. Israel
indicated that government has to give the private sector incentives to expand
their reforestation operations. Tree planting is a risky business especially
when it comes to prices. Poaching, diseases, and natural calamities pose real
threats to private investments. Tree farming in itself might be a hard sell,
but Israel argued that “agroforestry and forestry tourism as alternative
ventures can be promoted.”
To help address input price
risk, government seedling nurseries must be capacitated to provide steady
supply of good quality of seedlings at cheaper prices. More stringent laws
against poaching must also be put in place such as having an effective reward
system for catching tree poachers and a higher penalty for offenders including
sufficiently long prison sentences. Likewise, government should extend crop
insurance coverage to tree planting and conduct better anti-disease and pest
control activities.
Lastly, government should
assist tree farmers market their products through better organization,
especially when it comes to entering and engaging the markets here and abroad,
and provision of better transport infrastructure.
“Government should help tree
farmers organize themselves into marketing cooperatives. This way, they can
have better access to international markets for commercial logs and processed
wood products. Cooperatives, for example, can also invest in commonly owned
equipment and facilities, such as chain saws and trucks, for harvesting and
transporting logs to markets by their members,” Mr. Israel recommended.
At the same time, road and
bridge infrastructure in the rural areas must also be improved to hasten the
transportation of tree production inputs and harvested logs from the planting
sites to the holding areas and markets.
Private reforestation is one
facet of nongovernment reforestation, founded on the principle of engaging
citizens and nongovernment groups to care for, protect, and help manage the
country’s remaining forest resources. It is to the government’s interest to
give its private partners more opportunities to participate and enhance
conservation efforts. (PIDS)
Comments
Post a Comment