Quality of
infrastructure in the Philippines is second to the last in the ASEAN region.
This was disclosed by Dr. Adoracion Navarro, senior research fellow of the
Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), during the forum
"Financing Infrastructure in the Philippines” held at PIDS.
“In the Global
Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 of the World Economic Forum, the Philippines
is ranked 98th among 144 countries in terms of quality of
overall infrastructure. Philippine infrastructure is worse than Cambodia’s,”
Navarro said.
In the ASEAN
region, the only country the Philippines overtook was Viet Nam that placed 119th,
the ASEAN nation with the poorest quality of infrastructure. Ranked first in
the region is Singapore, which is second overall among 144 countries. Malaysia
was ranked 29th; Brunei Darussalam, 43th; Thailand, 49th;
Cambodia, 72th; and Indonesia; 92th. Lao PDR and Myanmar are not included in
the ranking.
The Philippines
got the lowest rank in terms of quality of port infrastructure (120th)
and air transport infrastructure (112th). This is clearly worse than
Cambodia’s 69th and 75th ranking
in port and air transport infrastructure, respectively.
Navarro attributes
this poor turnout to underinvestment in infrastructure. In 2012, only 11
percent of the total appropriated budget for infrastructure was spent—a
scenario that has not changed since 2010.
Navarro said the
decreasing reliance on official development assistance (ODA) loans also
contributed to the low quality of Philippine infrastructure. In 2012, ODA loans
for infrastructure was more than US$5 million, which was relatively smaller
than the figure in 2008 which was over US$6 million.
As of 2013, there
are 21 projects in the pipeline under the Public-Private Partnership scheme.
Required investments in 18 of these projects are projected at US$5 billion.
Three of the 21 projects do not have cost estimates yet.
Navarro challenged
stakeholders in the financial sector to take advantage of the liquid financial
market given the huge projects costs in infrastructure and the single borrower
limits faced by banks in direct lending. Given the maturity of lending capital
by Philippine banks (10-15 years) and the long gestation of infrastructure
projects (25-30 years), the government could facilitate the creation of credit
enhancements for infrastructure bonds that can be issued by private issuers.
“The government
should also organize a group of experts from both the private and public
sectors to formulate clear mechanisms and an institutional setup to mobilize
bank resources for infrastructure financing,” said Navarro. (PIDS)
Comments
Post a Comment