REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
FIRST JUDICIAL REGION
BRANCH 17, BATAC CITY, ILOCOS NORTE
VIRGIE INES RUIZ LOMUNTAD,
Petitioner,
-versus-
PAUL REYNOLD P. LOMUNTAD,
Respondent
CIVIL CASE NO. 5537-17
X ---------------------------------- X
SUMMONS BY
PUBLICATION
Whereas, on January 15, 2016,
a Petition was filed before this Court, which reads as follows:
1.
That petitioner is
of legal age, Filipino citizen, married to Paul Reynold P. Lomuntad and a
resident of Brgy. 6, San Julian, Batac City, Ilocos Norte, Philippines, while
respondent is her husband, likewise of legal age, Filipino citizen, married and
whose last known address is at 117 P. Manahan St., Pasay City, Philippines,
where he may be served with court processes;
2.
That petitioner was
then a working student when she came to know the respondent who was then her
classmate in college of law in Manila;
3.
That they became
close to one another and later became sweethearts;
4.
That when respondent
transferred to another school, petitioner and respondent maintained their
romantic relationship until they decided to be getting married on February 9,
1996 at Quezon City Hall, a certified true copy of their marriage contract is
hereto attached as Annex “A”;
5.
That after their
marriage, petitioner and respondent lived together as husband and wife in an
apartment in Pasay City. They lived a blissful married life. However,
petitioner discovered that respondent was a controlling husband. He imposed
rigid rules but petitioner followed his orders out of love and respect;
6.
That petitioner
likewise discovered that respondent manifested dependency on several matters
that petitioner has to exert extra effort to help respondent in his studies;
7.
That during their
cohabitation, they begot a child named, FRANCIS RUIZ LOMUNTAD, born on January
1, 1997, a certified true copy of his birth certificate is hereto attached as
Annex “B”;
8.
That after her
graduation, petitioner continued working at the Department of Energy while
respondent’s dependency became worse but she remained supportive. Every six
months, she would enroll respondent for a Civil Service Review Class but he
flunked so many times. Respondent’s career did not work at well in Manila until
they decided to move to the home province of respondent to have a better chance
of employment;
9.
That long after the
birth of their son, respondent found work as administrator of a local college
in Samar. Respondent would leave Manila every week for the first month and
twice on the second month of his being employed there. Their plan was for
respondent to settle down and adjust to life in Samar until such time that they
would relocate thereat to raise their family;
10.
That petitioner
found out later that their plan would not materialize for about two months that
respondent started working in the province, he met his former girlfriend and
started seeing her regularly and with whom he got sexually involved that
respondent would be spending every night at her house;
11.
That thinking about
the welfare of their son, petitioner endured the ordeal of having a third party
in their marriage and accepted the fact that respondent was seeing another
woman in his place;
12.
That when things
became more serious to the point that respondent has to choose between
petitioner and the other woman, petitioner never wanted to give up just for the
sake of being his wife in Manila while the other woman would be respondent’s
companion in Samar.
13.
That after two
months, respondent arrived in Manila informing the petitioner that he married
his ex-girlfriend. That petitioner was devastated. She felt insulted and
violated.
14.
That in the year
2000, petitioner and respondent parted ways especially so because respondent
stopped seeing petitioner and their child. Respondent likewise stopped
providing support for his family;
15.
That in the year
2004, petitioner moved to Laoag City to start a new life and raise her son
alone even without the support of respondent;
16.
That the
relationship between petitioner and respondent was estranged in the year 2004
and they stopped communicating with each other;
17.
That the marriage
between petitioner and respondent is void from the beginning for the reason
that at the time petitioner and respondent contracted marriage, respondent was
psychologically incapacitated to perform his marital obligations and such
incapacity became manifest only after the celebration of their marriage;
18.
That petitioner and
respondent are obliged under the law to observe mutual love, respect and
fidelity and render mutual help and support, materially, socially and spiritually
bjut these are the essential obligations of marriage which the respondent
failed and in incapable of performing or fulfilling;
19.
That respondent was
remiss in the performance of his marital obligations to render mutual help and
support to observe mutual love, respect and fidelity;
a. He is unfaithful. He cannot maintain a lasting
relationship. He got involved with extra-marital affair that brought emotional
torment and insult to his wife;
b. He is self-centered and egocentric individual. He manifested
lack of interest in fulfilling his duties as a husband and a father to their
child. No feeling of guild was ever manifested by him in spite of his
wrongdoings. He would never accept any fault;
c. He is irresponsible. He was totally dependent for financial
support upon his wife by manipulating her. He lacks future planning. He
abandoned his marital and paternal obligations;
d. He is self-righteous and evasive. He avoids his
responsibilities by avoiding their marital issues and as a result all the marital
responsibilities were left on petitioner shoulder;
20.The malady and mental disposition of the respondent has
seriously and effectively prevented petitioner and respondent from having a
functional normal marital life that would be conducive to bringing up a healthy
personal inter-marital relationship within the family and which is necessary
for its growth.
21.
That respondent’s
continuing non fulfillment of his marital obligations finally destroyed the
integrity and wholeness of their marriage;
22.
That respondent’s
psychological incapacity to perform the essential marital obligations is due ot
the fact that he is suffering from a Narcissistic Personality ?Disorder with
underlying Antisocial and Dependent Personality Traits which is grave.
Incurable and deeply rooted and would persist over time resulting in a Partner
Relational Problem in their marriage;
23.
That petitioner and
respondent do not have conjugal properties and neither do they have conjugal
obligations;
24.That petitioner is constrained to file this action to
free herself from the inequity of being bound by a marriage to a husband who
only cares for himself and has totally neglected his marital and parental
obligations.
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully
prayed of this Honorable Court that the marriage between petitioner and
respondent be declared null and void in accordance with Article 36 of the
Family Code of the Philippines and Executive Order No. 209 as amended by
Executive Order No. 227
City of Laoag for City of
Batac, Ilocos Norte, January 14, 2016.
NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to
Sec. 15, Rule 14 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, the herein respondent
Paul Reynold P. Lomuntad is hereby given sixty (60) days from the last
publication of this Summons within which to answer the complaint. Summons
should be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Philippines at
the expense of petitioner Virgie Ines Ruiz Lomuntad.
WITNESS THE HONORABLE ANGELO
M. ALBANO, Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 17, Batac City,
Ilocos Norte, Philippines this 8th day of April, 2016.
(SGD) ATTY.
CHARISMA NAIDA S. CASTILLO-MARTIN
Clerk of Court
V.
May 2, 9, 16, 2016*IT
__________________________________________
Deed of Extrajudicial Settlement
with Absolute Sale of a Portion
Notice is hereby given that the intestate estate of the
late ALMARIO BOLOS SR. consisting of one-half (1/2) share of a parcel of land
designated as Lot No. 21162-A, CSD-01-006963-0 (equivalent to Lot 50932,
CAD-398 of Batac Cadastre, covered by OCT No. P-422 containing an area of 2,267
sq.m., situated at Brgy. Tabug, Batac City, Ilocos Norte has been adjudicated
by heirs CONSUELO C. BOLOS, Widow, DANILO BOLOS, ALEXANDER BOLOS and ALMARIO
BOLOS JR. and simultaneously sold a portion of the above-described parcel of land
containing an area of 98 sq.m. designated as Lot No. 50932-B under Subdivision
Plan PSD-02-081196 unto spouses SHERWIN TABILA and SARAH JANE TABILA ratified
and acknowledged before Notary Public ATTY. YVETTE N. CONVENTO-LEYNES as per
Doc. No. 82; Page No.9; Bk No. LXXXVIII; s. of 2015.
May 2, 9, 16, 2016*IT
NOTICE OF ADJUDICATION AND ABSOLUTE SALE
Notice is hereby given that the estate of the late
CLEMENCIA VALDEZ PAGUIRIGAN A.K.A CLEMENCIA VALDEZ PASCUA consisting of her
interests in Lot No. 31091 of the Cadastral Survey of Laoag, covered by T.C.T.
No. T-25923 and Lot No. 31097 of the Cadastral Survey of Laoag, covered by
T.C.T. No. T-25924 has been adjudicated by his heir, as per Deed of
Adjudication dated April 11, 2015, designated as Doc. No. 492; Page No. 99;
Book No. CD; Series of 2015 of Notary
Public ATTY. JUAN CONRADO A. RESPICIO II.
May 2, 9, 16, 2016*IT
_______________________________________________________
DEED OF EXTRAJUDICIAL SETTLEMENT OF ESTATE WITH SALE
Notice is hereby given that the intestate estate of the
late MARIANO CAMALIG consisting of two (2) parcels of land designated as Lot
No. 11, BCS-012805-000061, VLT, being a portion of Lot 13158 and 13159, CAD 398
and 3/6 share of Lot No. 1162 of the Batac Cadastre, Cad. Case No. N-1-IV,
L.R.C. Cadastral Record No. N-532 with improvement erected thereon covered by
OCT NOS. C-6273 and 0-3293 containing an area of 286 sq.m. and 1,072.31 sq.m. situated
at Brgy. 16-S Quiling Sur and in the Barrio of 7, Caunayan both of Municipality
of Batac, Province of Ilocos Norte has been adjudicated by his heirs
extrajudicially and simultaneously sold the entirety of Lot No. 11 to VIOLETA
RUGUIAN HILL married to GRAHAM HILL ratified and acknowledged before Notary
Public FRANCISCO A. MUSNI as per Doc. No. 495; Page No. 99; Bk. No. LXIII; S.
of 2014.
May 2, 9, 16, 2016*IT
_______________________________________________________
DEED OF ADJUDICATION AND ABSOLUTE SALE
Notice is hereby given that the intestate estate of the
deceased ETRELITA A. DELA CRUZ, consisting of her rights, shares, interest and
participation over Lot No. 14447-B of the Laoag Cadastre situated at Brgy. Vira
(now Camanggaan) Laoag City and covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No.
T-29645 had been the subject of adjudication by her heirs, and simultaneously
sold to LORNALYN AGUSTIN-REGPALA as per Doc. No. 200; Page No. 40; Book No.
LVIII; Series of 2014 of the Notarial Register of ATTY NOEL DOMINGO CONCEPCION
of Laoag City.
May 2, 9, 16, 2016*IT
_______________________________________________________
Comments
Post a Comment