By Alfredo C. Garvida Jr.
Contributor
With
only a week left before the Filipino
electorate goes to the polls to finally render its verdict as to who will
govern this nation for the next six years on the national level, serious
questions have started to arise which could still alter the course of the voters'
preference along the projections of the election surveys.
Davao Mayor Rodrigo Duterte,
the intemperate political warrior from Mindanao, who has widened his lead over
his closest rival even after his reckless joke about that raped and murdered
Australian woman inside a prison cell in his family's political fiefdom that is
Davao City, appears on his way to becoming the next Philippine president after
the May 9 elections—if the latest ABS-CBN-sponsored Pulse Asia survey remains
unchanged up to election time. This would mean that those who voted for him
were not affected by his reckless words and dispositions in public: because he
is their "man" who will solve their woes against criminals and
corrupt people in government "in 3 to 6 months."
His rhetoric is tantalizing,
and his presentation of himself as an honest man in the public service, who
would "cut off the balls" of a dishonest cabinet undersecretary, was
pleasing to the ears of people who have been overdosed with the licentious
existence of corruption in government.
The problem with Mr.
Duterte's rhetoric, however, lies in his inability to explain how he
will wipe out criminality in the land in 3 to 6 months' time. True, he is
long been perceived as the main man of the Davao Death Squad that has been
blamed for innumerable summary executions in the city, all in the name of what
he calls summary justice. He has admitted, without any reservation or traces of
compunction, that he has killed hundreds of man on suspicion of being
criminals. And people love him for this. He is their savior, their shining
knight in armor; but he has not solved criminality in Davao City—where he and
his family have ruled for more than two decades on—within a period of 6 months,
lest this vaunted city of the South would not be listed yet as the no. 4
crime-infested area in the whole of the Philippine archipelago by the
Philippine National Police to date.
Sen. Antonio Trillanes just
last week came out with an explosive revelation about Mr. Duterte's bank
accounts where the fighting mayor of Davao City did not declare on his
Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN). The anti-graft advocate
senator, who is also running for vice president, is alleging that about P4.2
billion have gone through his bank accounts' deposits since 2006 and he wants
to know if taxes have been paid out of these transactions and/or whether they
have been declared in his SALN during these periods, as required by law.
Most importantly, Mr.
Trillanes wants to know where did all these monies come from? If they came from
business dealings, why is Mr. Duterte pleading to the people that he is no rich
man? If they came from other sources, like contributions, donations and
whatever else, under what basis were they given to him for? And were they
properly declared as income and assets during all those transaction years?
The big lesson here, that the
Filipinos must keep in their hearts, is that they should not become captive to
their emotions; that reason must reign over passion when passing judgment over
a candidate.
Mr. Duterte must come out
clean and precise in explaining his side about the Trillanes expose. Otherwise,
if he gets elected as president, he had taken the people for a ride. Judgment
rests accordingly on the Filipino electorate then comes the 9th of
May. It is the people who create a good government, because as Thomas Jefferson
once said "a just government derives its power from a just people."
Comments
Post a Comment