(First of two parts)
What
will the future of Philippine cities look
like in 20 or 40 years’ time? A storm is brewing in Asia, will Philippine
cities transcend beyond the narrative of trauma and disasters? Is there an
alternative future for Philippine cities or would it learn from the past to
innovate, act and create the preferred story? Are current strategies enough to
transform our cities or do we need to question our assumptions now of continued
economic growth and rethink our ways of knowing the city and change the way we
imagine our cities and leadership from the big man rule, autocratic, corrupt
and isolated to the fresh food market, pluralistic, democratic and
participatory?
These are some of the
questions that the participants of the UNESCO Resilient Cities, Brighter
Futures workshop explored for four days. Using anticipatory thinking and
strategic foresight methods, city leaders and experts, researchers, managers,
advocates, social scientists and consultants from all over the country and the
world deconstructed and reconstructed
Philippine city futures in a climate change driven era.
The Laoag forum workshop is a
part of a broader global foresight project launched by UNESCO and the
Rockefeller Foundation this year on futures literacy and to introduce foresight
to decision-making, public policy and governance. The initiative aims to help
communities better prepare for the future by using anticipatory thinking and
foresight methodologies and assist them to become future-literate.
Similar workshops have been
held in Oslo Norway; Munich, Germany and Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
The Laoag output will be presented
to UNESCO Paris and UNESCO-Rockefeller Foundation organized strategic foresight
conference this year. The organizers plan to publish and submit copies of the
final report to the UNESCO National Commission of the Philippines, the
Department of Interior and Local Government, Congress, the League of
Philippines and the Office of the President, International Government and
Non-Government agencies among others.
Reimagining Philippine cities
To Sohail Inayatullah, notably one of the best futurists and
city experts in the world right now, a fellow of the World Futures Studies
Federation and the World Academy of Arts and Sciences and main speaker and
facilitator of the Laoag edition of the UNESCO future lecture series and
knowledge workshop, cities are fast emerging agents of global policy-making and
change.
And as cities faces multiple
challenges like climate change, globalization and demographic shifts,
Inayatullah argued that cities need to re-think itself in theory and practice,
to be versatile and to be flexible enough for it to respond, innovate and usher
in a new era.
Rigid concepts, models,
priorities, worldviews and leadership practices of the city that leads to urban
poverty, pollution, overcrowding, decay and decline must be questioned so that
new city concepts, frameworks and urban experiences could emerge. To do this,
Philippine cities should embark and perhaps invest more aggressively on urban
regeneration projects that increases social, economic and community resilience.
Population drifts from rural to urban are expected to rise and if cities fail
to read the weak signals they might end up becoming or repeating the stories of
Metro Manila, Baguio and Dagupan cities—living beyond 3,500% of sustainable
levels, caught in the middle income trap and highly vulnerable to climatic
changes and exposure.
In Asia, it is projected that
its urban population will double from 1.6 to 3 billion by 2050. Philippine
cities have to face up to this emerging population and migration trends but how
many of its cities will be able to meet the challenge? Just imagine the social and economic cost of
the ASEAN integration and climate change to an unprepared Philippine city. To
be forewarned is to be forearmed. Simply put, if you know something beforehand,
you can prepare for it. Being aware of the critical drivers and taking the big
picture approach can help cities regenerate and transform amidst rapidly
evolving challenges.
Strategies and metaphors to the transform the future
Using anticipatory methods, participants were able to
re-imagine the contexts and purposes of Philippine cities in a post-Haiyan plus
the ASEAN integration, the rise of Asia, Chindia, etc. scenario.
New narratives, metaphors,
images, strategies, policies and programs to achieve the preferred future
Philippine cities were proposed. Cities are at the forefront of these solutions
and innovations and when they happen it could accelerate inclusive growth, open
up new value chains for innovation and better city living conditions.
The low hanging fruit was the
Smart city. Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of urban systems, social
cohesion, innovation, infrastructure, architecture, energy, transport, national
and local governance and the participation of the media, academia and the non-profit
sector was essential to creating the smart city. We have to be smart enough to
see the intersection of all the drivers mentioned to create the smart city that
we want. Changing the way we live, work and play in urban environments requires
asking the unasked questions and integrate or choose the best tools like
anticipatory thinking and foresight to urban planning and innovation. Technology is a critical driver to this type
of city. The metaphor was arangkada.
Downside however was the tusong-matsing—a
city trying to catch up with its neighbors, economic growth driven, smart but
stupid. (To be concluded)
Comments
Post a Comment