(Statement delivered by Senator Loren Legarda at the
forum “Towards COP 21: The civil society mobilized for the climate” on 26 February 2015 at
the National Museum, Manila)
This assembly bears a mark of distinction. Forty-three years ago on
this day, then UN Secretary-General U Thant signed the Earth Day Proclamation.
Margaret Mead, one of the co-signatories of the original proclamation,
succinctly described its importance when she said, “EARTH DAY uses one of
humanity’s great discoveries -- the discovery of anniversaries by which,
throughout time, human beings are reminded of the need for continuing care
which is vital to Earth’s safety.” Today, we are not just
reminded. We are compelled to take action.
I
have been asked to speak on the consequences of inaction against climate
change, which is so complex and overreaching in its impacts that we should now
begin calling it the ‘climate crisis.’ We are not here today to discuss the
theoretical merits of doing something versus doing nothing. The signs are all around us. The numbers speak for
themselves. It is no longer an issue of taking action, but rather of how much
action we need to take.
Each
year, five million lives are lost due to climate change and the health impacts
of its chief driver—fossil fuels. A US government report indicated that “Estimates in the climate economics literature suggest that inaction that results
in warming of 3° Celsius above preindustrial levels could increase economic
damages by approximately 0.9 percent of global output.” The World Health Organization estimates direct damage
costs to health alone at between 2 and 4 billion dollars each year by 2030.
We have been warned and we continue to
be warned, but we are just not listening enough.
As
early as the late 1800s, science has been trying to give us dire warnings that
industrial coal burning enhances the greenhouse gas effect. The warnings
remained unheeded, notwithstanding the imperious voice of science.
In
fact, the world’s actions of the past decades betrayed the fundamental merits
of these warnings. The 5th Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change upheld this observation
by concluding that “about half of the anthropogenic CO2 emissions between 1750 and 2011
have occurred in the last 40 years.”
The
same report concludes that greenhouse gas emissions have “continued to increase
over 1970 to 2010 with larger
absolute increases between 2000 and 2010.” It is not that we did not act. The world just decided to look
the other way.
Between
1880 and 2012, average global temperatures increased by 0.85 degrees Celsius. With larger absolute increases
in GHG between 2000 and 2010, one can only imagine how much we have really
pushed our world into the brink of irreversible destruction. Again, it is not that we did
nothing. We just did the opposite of
what we should have done.
The
consequences are telling.
The
world will continue to get warmer and with this comes long lasting changes in
our climate system. Ordinary people have limited
understanding of this, until they are painfully introduced to their impacts via
extremely harsh weather events, flooding, declining fish catch, water scarcity,
declining agricultural harvests, exacerbating health issues, extinction of
animal and plant species, displacement of people, and even the demise of
low-lying areas, among others.
The
Philippines is at the top of the list of the Global Climate Risk Index of 2015—the
latest list of countries most affected by weather-related disasters like
storms, floods, and heat waves. The top 10 countries are all developing
countries, underscoring the fact that the vast majority of these impacts are felt in developing
countries because they are the least prepared to deal with the climate crisis.
Our
country has been the recipient of technical assistance and aid from developed
countries to help us with our adaptation to the new normal. We are grateful for
this; however, we cannot submit to the notion that our survival will be defined
by the charity of others. I do not mean to undermine the
nobility of the giver, but what is the meaning of this contribution if the survival
of future generations, including our own, is threatened?
As
I speak, the debate continues on whether to act now or to delay implementing
mitigation policies until a future date. In the meantime, lives continue
to perish. The irony does not end there. Others who choose not to act, justify
inaction in the name of development.
One
thing is clear. Delaying action only “shifts burden from the present to the
future.” By then, as in cancer, it might be too late to reverse the disastrous
effects of global warming.
As
a developing nation that contributes a mere .03 percent of the world's
greenhouse gases, we have done our share to the world's mitigation efforts and
we ask, “Why have others not?”
We
implore the world’s largest economies to deliver their concrete commitments on
greenhouse gas emission reductions. This is not the time for restraint or for
wagging the finger of indictment. This is the moment for
collective action.
I
started with a recollection of an event forty-three years ago that paved the
way for our yearly celebration of Earth Day so that we are constantly reminded
of our responsibility to the only world we have.
Let
us also be reminded of our responsibility to ensure that the future generations
will have the benefits of a balanced and healthful ecology. Inter-generational
responsibility needs to move from being an idea to a plan of concrete and
urgent action.
If
we start today, there is no promise that we will be lucky enough to see the
undoing of the damage within our lifetime, but at least, we leave our world
with the gift of hope for a better, kinder future.
Comments
Post a Comment