The Philippines
may be losing as much as 10% of its gross domestic product (GDP) because
workers are not always able to use their skills at their highest productive
value, according to the Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS) senior
research fellow Michael Ralph Abrigo.
Speaking at the
2026 Development Policy Research Month (DPRM) Kick-off Press Conference and
Media Awards on September 1, 2026, Abrigo said the country’s challenge is not
limited to the production of skilled workers. It also involves ensuring that
workers are deployed and allowed to work in ways that make full use of their
capabilities.
“What we
estimate is as much as 10% of our GDP is actually lost because of this
misallocation of talent,” Abrigo said during the open forum.
He explained
that talent misallocation occurs when the system does not allow skilled workers
to use their skills at their most optimal level.
It is different
from unemployment or a lack of skills. A person can be employed, educated, and
skilled and still experience talent misallocation if they perform work below
their capabilities or spend too much time on tasks unrelated to their core
expertise.
The problem can
occur even among workers who are already employed. Abrigo cited teachers as an
example, noting that administrative reports and committee requirements can take
time away from their core responsibility of teaching.
“Imagine you
have to do all these reports kasi part ka ng mga committees. So, bago ka pa makapagturo kailangan mo munang
gawin ‘yun. [Imagine having to prepare all these reports because you are
part of various committees. So, before you can even teach, you have to take
care of all those reports first],” he said.
By comparison,
he noted that teachers in other countries can arrive in the classroom and focus
on teaching, allowing them to deploy their talents without some of the
additional requirements.
For Abrigo, the
question is therefore not simply how the country can produce skilled workers,
but how it can convert human capital into productive workers.
“We actually
have estimates—recent estimates. Gaano
kalaki ang nawawala sa productivity ng
buong bansa because of this misallocation of talent? [How much productivity
does the country lose because people’s skills and talents are not being used in
the jobs or activities where they are most productive?]” he said.
The issue also
extends beyond formal policies, Abrigo pointed to informal rules and practices
that can affect how Filipino workers are valued and deployed.
He cited cases
in which qualified Filipino professionals may still be subjected to additional
scrutiny because of characteristics unrelated to their competence.
“These are
informal rules that somehow limit our capacity to use our workforce,” he said.
The experience
of senior high school graduates provides another example of how perceptions can
affect the use of human capital.
Abrigo recalled
that when senior high school was first introduced, employers were initially
skeptical about the capabilities of its graduates. Although the government and
Department of Education had said the students were trained to perform specific
tasks, the private sector was not immediately convinced.
That changed as
employers gained experience with the graduates.
“I think that
openness comes with time, with experience,” Abrigo said, noting that employers
who had tried hiring senior high school graduates found them to be “very
efficient” and “very productive.”
He said a study
found that senior high school graduates were paid about 15% more than workers
who had completed only junior high school.
The discussion
suggests that the return on investments in education depends not only on
whether people acquire skills, but also on whether employers recognize and
effectively use those skills.
PIDS senior research
fellow Valerie Gilbert Ulep similarly linked human capital investments to
productivity, emphasizing that health and education should be viewed as
productive assets rather than as separate social-sector concerns.
Ulep said poor
health can affect attendance and productivity, with the effects accumulating
across the economy. He also stressed the importance of investing in preventive
health care so that people remain healthy and productive rather than entering
the health system only when illnesses have reached advanced stages.
Education
presents a parallel challenge. While access to education has expanded, Ulep
said the focus must increasingly shift toward the quality and relevance of
learning because the economic return from schooling depends on what people
actually know and can do.
“Education is
productivity infrastructure, like health,” Ulep said in his presentation.
The connection
runs both ways. Healthier and better-skilled workers can be more productive,
while a stronger economy can generate better jobs and greater resources for
continued investment in human capital.
The private
sector, meanwhile, needs conditions that allow it to invest and create
productive employment. Abrigo identified regulatory predictability as one of
the key requirements for businesses, alongside assurance that the private and
public sectors can operate within clearly defined roles.
“The two things
that are actually needed by the private sector are, firstly, regulatory
predictability,” Abrigo said, adding that businesses also need “market capture
or market assurance.”
For PIDS senior research
fellow John Paolo Rivera, these issues point to the need to view the economy,
education, and health as interconnected parts of a single system rather than as
separate policy areas.
The Philippines
has reached upper-middle-income status, Rivera noted, but economic growth
should ultimately be assessed by whether it builds capabilities that support
higher productivity and sustained transformation.
The challenge,
therefore, is not simply to create more programs or produce more graduates. It
is to ensure that investments in people translate into capabilities that are
actually used.
Abrigo said this
requires moving beyond counting programs, projects, and compliance toward
asking whether incentives are aligned, whether capabilities are lasting,
whether accountability is shared, and whether interventions are producing
system-level outcomes.
“The goal is not
simply to do more things. It is to make the system work better together,” he
said.
PIDS honors
media partners in advancing research-informed public discourse
The Kick-off
also featured Saliksik at the Balita: PIDS Media Awards 2026, which recognized
more than 35 media organizations and journalists who have consistently brought
PIDS research and experts into public discussion.
The awardees
were:
Tagapanguna sa
Himpapawid: Outstanding Broadcast Media Partner — Bilyonaryo News Channel, for
consistently featuring PIDS research and experts in its broadcast programs from
July 2025 to July 2026.
Daluyan ng
Dunong: Outstanding Print/Online Media Partner — BusinessWorld, for
highlighting PIDS studies and experts in its online coverage.
Kwentista ng
Pananaliksik: Most Supportive Print/Online Journalist — Ricardo Austria of
Manila Bulletin and Ian Nicolas Cigaral of Philippine Daily Inquirer, for
consistently citing PIDS studies and experts.
Boses ng Talino:
Most Supportive Broadcast Personality — Robert Tan of Bilyonaryo News Channel,
for frequently featuring PIDS research in television segments.
Lingkod-Dunong:
Most Supportive Government Media Partner — Philippine Information Agency (PIA),
for continuing to support the dissemination of PIDS research through news
features, interviews, and special coverage.
The recognition
underscores the media's role in ensuring that policy research moves beyond
academic and government circles and becomes part of public understanding and
policy dialogue.
The 2026
Development Policy Research Month is the 24th annual observance of
the national policy research month and is held every September pursuant to
Malacañang Proclamation No. 247, s. 2002. The 2026 Kick-off marked the start of
a month-long series of policy discussions examining how the Philippines can better
develop and use its human capital. (PIDS)
%F0%9F%AA%B3.jpg)
Comments
Post a Comment