By Leilanie G. Adriano
Staff Reporter
The Regional Trial Court Branch 19 presided by a lone executive judge covering six
northern towns of the province is now on the hot seat following the second
installment of a privilege speech of a Sangguniang Panlalawigan member, who
spilled the beans with the speech titled “Justice for sale?”.
The same court is presently hearing the
case of four Chinese nationals arrested with unlicensed firearms and explosives
at a checkpoint in Pasuquin on May 28 where the judge voluntarily inhibited
herself and later on reconsidered this decision following a motion for
reconsideration as she is now back hearing the case.
On September 16, SP member Vicentio
“Toto” M. Lazo again raised and delivered a privilege speech urging other
members of the provincial board “to do something” while the case of four
Chinese nationals has yet to be decided at the said court.
On September 9, in Lazo’s first
privilege speech, he asked the provincial board to take a closer look at the
Chinese nationals’ case pending the passage of an ordinance institutionalizing
the creation of the provincial anti-private armed group council (PAGC) which
will be established under the Ilocos Norte government.
This was referred to the committee on
laws and good government for appropriate action.
As a result, fellow lawyer and SP member
Da Vinci M. Crisostomo, in his capacity as chairperson of the committee on laws,
said they will act “swiftly” on this while preparing a resolution addressed to
the court administrator of the Supreme Court to investigate Branch 19.
Citing criminal case no. 1962-19
involving the illegal drug trade of an alleged “shabu queen” sentenced on
January 14, 2013 to life imprisonment. The suspect however was acquitted after
a new lawyer took over her case and granted his motion for new trial.
Lazo related that the “newly discovered
evidence in the person of a witness, the prosecutor did not even cross examine
the witness for reason that whatever she testified to was already testified on
during the trial proper so there’s no need to cross examine, which is correct.”
“But I was surprised when the decision
convicting the accused was changed so that she was ultimately acquitted,” Lazo
added citing this is just one of the cases at Branch 19 which he considers as “highly
irregular”.
The same lawyer and prosecutor being
referred to by Lazo in the person of Atty. Ferdinand Agustin and Judge
Rosemarie Ramos are the ones presently handling the case of four Chinese
nationals—Agustin as the legal counsel of the suspects and Ramos as the judge of
Branch 19.
The Chinese nationals charged with illegal possession of firearms. |
The cache of firearms and ammunitions seized from the Chinese nationals |
“The case speaks for itself. I smell
fish here and we must do something about it to protect our constituents of
northern towns,” Lazo said.
When asked for comment, lawyer Agustin said,
“That’s the beauty of democratic government. I don’t know his (Lazo) basis for
telling that but the different courts would bear me out, it’s not just Branch
19 where I have cases.”
He said the case being referred to by
Lazo (Criminal case no. 1962-19) is not the first time where he merely
exercised “remedial act” leading to the acquittal of his client.
“I can’t properly react on this because
I don’t know his basis. I only performed my duties inside the court and
whatever happens outside, it’s already beyond my concern,” Agustin added.
In her interview aired in a local radio
station, Ramos vehemently denied Lazo’s allegations saying, “That’s too
unfair!”
“Buwan
ang bibilang namin para makagawa kami ng isang decision. Ang hirap magbago ng decision. Mas mahirap pa kaysa sa gumawa ka ng
decision kasi kapag binago mo ang decision parang binabaliktad mo rin ang sarili mo,” the judge said.
As judge, she said it takes her months
to decide on a case as it entails careful study and research regardless of who
is concerned.
Meanwhile, Ramos spokesperson, lawyer
Ferdinand Ignacio said he has already conferred with Agustin in preparing a
complaint at the Sangguniang Panlalawigan against Lazo.
Comments
Post a Comment