NOT ONCE but twice. President
B.S. Aquino mentioned Laoag City two times in his State of the nation Address
on July 28 at the Batasan in Quezon City.
First is when he announced
that NEDA (which, incidentally, is headed by an Ilocos Norte native and MMSU
alumnus—Sec. Arsenio Balisacan) has approved the Laoag City bypass road; second
when he illustrated the extent of national highways his administration has
built: it can connect the cities of Laoag and Zamboanga four times, he said.
It is quite refreshing to
note that Laoag City bears an imprint in the President’s consciousness, yet he
has never come here since he became president. I am not sure why, but it could
be two things: maybe he thinks Ilocos is hostile ground for him or, in reality,
he doesn’t really care enough about this part of his kingdom. To her credit,
Governor Imee Marcos has always spoken well about PNoy, and would share stories
about their experiences in congress—they being together in the opposition
during the time of Gloria Arroyo.
PNoy did come to Ilocos
though when he needed our votes, and while he did not rank first in the polls
here, with Joseph Estrada and Manny Villar besting him, it was not bad.
Compared to her late mother who got zero in a number of precincts in the 1986
snap elections, PNoy got from Ilocanos a good number votes, and that included
mine and most of my colleagues in The
Ilocos Times: Mitch Esmino, and Steve Barreiro.
Not only did I vote for PNoy;
I wore yellow for almost two months preceding the 2010 presidential elections.
But I have not worn those shirts in a long while. It is odd that he mentioned
Laoag twice in connection to roads which connects us to the rest of the country
while he himself has seemingly disconnected himself from us since we became
part of the body he collectively calls “Boss.”
Let’s go back to the SONA. As
expected, the president’s State of the Nation Address boasted the government’s
achievements in the previous year. As usual, there are bloated statistics,
overrated accomplishments, and other endeavors that sounded good in the speech
but, in actuality, are characteristically mediocre. True to showbiz form, there
was also a lot of drama.
At the beginning of the
ninety-one minute speech, Mr. Aquino defended, although only subtly, the
Disbursement Acceleration Program, over which he is now being widely
criticized, and over which a growing number of impeachment complaints have been
filed against him. Footages of thankful DAP beneficiaries were even shown to
gain public sympathy.
To the President’s credit, he
did not attack the Supreme Court anymore the way he did days before the SONA.
Instead, in a sign of respect to Congress, he urged them to pass a supplemental
budget. Another good point for the President’s speech is his decision no longer
to pass the blame on our social ills to Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. It was also an
act of prudence that he did not boast or gloat about the imprisonment of three
senators accused of plunder over the PDAF. He deserves a tap on the shoulder
for seeing through the peace accord with the MILF, and hopefully the Bangsamoro
Basic Law will be enacted within his term.
The rest of what he said are
just noise. Government’s response to Yolanda, for instance, was in itself a
disaster, with the delivery of help going at snail’s pace and is even
shamefully tainted with corruption. Even as he boasted government efforts to
provide quality housing to those who were displaced, the victims themselves
belied this immediately and pointed out to their continued miserable condition.
Yes, a lot of roads may have been constructed but are they of good quality? And
what about the poor manpower planning in the face of K –to-12? He did not even
mention the Freedom of Information Act that media practitioners like me have
been lobbying for years. And what happened to agrarian reform?
The teary-eyed president,
with all his antiques and Argumentum ad
Misericordiam, a logical fallacy that appeals to emotion, has so far failed
to prove that everyone, be it a foe or an ally, will be punished if they do not
tread the straight path. As of now, only the political enemies of the
administration are being prosecuted. While the president himself may not have
been accused of stealing a penny from government, he should explain why
Hacienda Luisita benefitted from payouts funded by DAP.
I found it corny that this President,
already in his mid-fifties, again invoked the memory of his parents to gain
public sympathy. We know of course that he won not on account of his own
achievements but only by riding on the popularity of his elders. The Filipino
is worth fighting for? Fighting against who? Those who filed the impeachment
complaint? But they are not the enemy. Noynoy Aquino got it wrong. He must
learn to listen as well, and come to terms with his own shortcomings and excesses.
The time he wasted for his
dramatics could have been spent more on expounding on his vision of the
Philippines he will leave behind in 2016, and to what extent his administration
has been meeting targets. While he did say he wanted a successor who can ably
carry out the reforms he has started, the president could have taken the chance
to explain salient aspects of his development plan that can and should be
carried out regardless of whoever occupies Malacañang next. Moreover, he
could have stressed how we, ordinary citizens, can participate and contribute
actively towards that end.
Meanwhile, members of
Congress applauded too frequently and so hard before, during, and after the
president’s speech. It was reminiscent of the years of fall, disgrace, and
descent of Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. While Filipinos may be usually ma-drama, they can easily distinguish
sincerity from plasticity when it comes to the SONA and other political
speeches. Thankfully again, most of our countrymen, including administration
critics, perceived Aquino’s emotional episode, where his eyes became wet and
his voice cracked, as sincere.
All these said, I consider
the President’s speech as slightly above average. On a scale of 1-10, I’ll give
him an unemotional 6.5.
Comments
Post a Comment