WHILE in some reunion recently with former
college classmates and colleagues at work during my pre-priesthood years when I
myself was active in the professional field, I was struck by one of the
comments I heard in our conversations.
A friend who
is also an economist mentioned that the different ways many Western governments
took to tackle the global economic crisis that started sometime in 2008, taken
from both the capitalistic and socialist models, could not adequately resolve
the problem because they just relied on certain laws and policies prevailing in
their respective countries at that time.
Many of
these political and economic leaders are discovering that it takes more than
just following purely economic and civil laws to resolve the problem in a way
that could be considered most fair.
I have
always believed that merely following articulated laws or man-made laws, whether
in business or in our life in society in general, would not be enough, since
these laws would always be in need with the proper spirit for them to be as
they should be.
These laws,
at best, can only give some kind of guideline. They dispose us to the ways of
truth, charity, justice. But they cannot by themselves achieve those goals
unless they are animated by the real source of truth, charity and justice which
can only be God, our creator and Father.
At best,
they can somehow regulate the external aspects of a given problem or situation
but are quite silent on the internal aspects. They can be good in sanctioning
the macro dimensions of our economy or political life, but are again very
tentative in the micro level.
These laws
and policies cannot function on their own. They need a deeper foundation, a
terra firma that in the end could only be God and his laws and standards. It’s
the hesitation or even aversion to put God in the core of our legal systems
that would somehow pervert our laws and policies even if they are formulated
with the best of intentions.
When
crafted, developed and lived independently of God or when pursued outside a
loving and faithful relationship with God, these laws can easily be manipulated
to suit one’s self-interest at the expense of the common good. They would miss
the finer points of ethics and morals so crucial in our life, personal and
social, here on earth.
And in that
set-up, it would always be the more powerful, in terms of wealth, fame,
talents, etc., who would dominate and tend to exploit the others. Their
authority, which is supposed to be a sharing of the authority of God, would be
used not to give glory to God and to serve others, but more to give glory to
themselves and to be served by others. In short, there is always the tendency
for people to abuse their authority.
In that
set-up, what are often excluded, deliberately or unintentionally, would be the
elements of mercy and compassion, the need for sacrifice, detachments from
things and others that are necessary and at the same time unavoidable in our
life here on earth.
It is a
set-up that is blind to these things and is prone to follow the law of the
jungle or the law of Talion that usually caters to the baser instincts of men
and hardly goes beyond them. The higher values of faith and morals are
disregarded, if not frowned upon.
The
requirements of our moral and spiritual life, so inalienable in us that even in
our mundane activities like business and politics they are always relevant, are
often unmet if not totally ignored.
It is a
set-up that tends to give a knee-jerk reaction to things at the expense of a
more comprehensive attitude. It is often taken up by the passion and the
excitement of the here-and-now and is quite subjective at the expense of a
longer and more objective view of things.
We need to
overcome the fear or whatever bias we have regarding the need to involve God in
our human affairs. We cannot say that just because what we are doing are purely
business or politics, God should not be involved.
While it’s
true that there is a certain legitimate autonomy in our temporal affairs, it
does not mean that God has nothing to do with them. Yes, we need to uphold that
autonomy and should not unduly mix God and religion in living out those
affairs, but it does not mean that God is not the beginning and end of these affairs.
Comments
Post a Comment