In our national fixation over Vice-President Jejomar Binay’s crumbling stature,
we overlook a vital concern: In next door Malaysia, the opposition is being
subjected to bare knuckle pressure by the ruling but increasingly
brittle United Malays National Organization.
“The Malaysian
opposition is in the cross hairs of a sedition blitz,” Agence
France Presse Dan Martin reports. Malaysian attorney N. Surendran
appeared in court to defend a fellow opposition lawmaker accused of insulting
the powerful ruling party. A few hours later, he faced a sedition charge
of his own.
Prime
Minister Najib Razak, pledged two years ago, that UMNO would
scrap the Sedition Act. It formed part of broad liberalization
promises to shore up sagging voter support.
But
reforms foundered amid conservative resistance within UMNO. And a
crackdown is under way to stifle dissent and thwart the
opposition’s growing electoral success. Najib's office insists
the Sedition Act will be replaced with a "National Harmony Bill" to
curb hate speech, possibly tabled by late 2015.
Speculation
is rife, however, that the replacement bill has stalled. Saifuddin Abdullah, a
leading UMNO moderate involved in pushing the bill forward, said it was being
opposed by forces who “still believe in a sledgehammer approach” on free
speech.
Independent
groups, like the independent Malaysian Bar Council, warned of “An
intense period of regression in the rule of law.” Nationalist rhetoric sows
fear in the large Chinese and Indian minorities. Not former hardline premier
Mahathir Mohamad. Last month, he publicly withdrew support from Najib
over his liberal vows,
Almost
immediately after its adoption in 1960, the Malaysian government began using
the Internal Security Act (ISA) as a tool against critics and political
opponents. Close to 3,000 persons were administratively detained between
passage of the Act in 1960 and 1981, when Dr. Mahathir Mohamed assumed the
prime ministership.
The
ethnic divide is widening, with continuing efforts by government to
increase the Islamic portion of the Malaysian population and reduce the non-Malay
elements of society, wrote historian Geoffrey Wade of University of Hong Kong.
Razak
has done little to redress the growing divisions and social inequalities
between communities within Malaysia except to promote his derided 1 Malaysia
initiative. The speciousness of the program was revealed in late 2013 when
Najib announced a new raft of advantageous policies for the Malay constituency.
Meanwhile, his deputy happily declares himself ‘Malay first and Malaysian
second.’
The
apparent powerlessness of Najib in the face of increasingly intense Malay
politicking suggests that his tenure will not extend too far into the future.
The resignation of the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) chairman P. Waytha
Moorthy from his position as deputy minister in the Prime Minister's Department
has further undermined Najib's position.
In
addition, the United Malays National Organization (Umno) has pursued the
elimination of key opposition figures such as Karpal Singh and Anwar Ibrahim
through the Umno-controlled courts. These actions suggest an administration in
grave crisis.
Radical
Malay nationalist groups such as Perkasa and Pekida continue to enjoy high
level support from government. They spout dangerous new pseudo theories of
Malay origins and current circumstance propose that the people of Chinese
descent in Malaysia are part of a long term southward invasion targeted at
Malays.
The
increasingly divisive dispute between Muslims and non-Muslims in Malaysia over
the use of the term ‘Allah’ has further incited sentiments nationwide. Recent
events have, intensity, led some observers to suggest the imminent demise of
democratic constitutionalism in Malaysia, and the growing potential for ethnic
violence.
The
parlous state of Malaysian education and the gagged press is also
attracting wide attention. These have major significance for regional stability
and great power relations.
Exclusion
of non-Malays from virtually every aspect of public life in Malaysia and the
increasing dissatisfaction of Malaysians in the Bornean states with Kuala
Lumpur are not simply domestic matters. Neighboring states and global powers
are closely watching the evolution of the Malaysian polity as it moves further
towards crisis.
What
do these diverse and increasingly intractable problems within Malaysia mean for
regional stability and for major power relations in Southeast Asia?
With
its long-standing policy of non-intervention in domestic affairs of members,
Asean portrays Malaysia as a fulcrum, connecting maritime and mainland
parts of Southeast Asia. However, within Asean states, there are all sorts of
softly spoken concerns about Malaysia's domestic contradictions.
The
country is being watched closely by the major global powers because they see
it as a key fault line in the region, and recognize the possibilities of
massive social and political dislocation—and even disintegration—resulting from
the various contradictions and inequalities.
Comments
Post a Comment