Business groups call on gov’t to define power supply and rate as key to sustainable and inclusive growth
Nine
major business organizations have urged
government to
define power supply security and competitive power rates as major twin
initiatives to realize aggressive industrialization and inclusiveness, with
public and private sector working together to achieve these objectives.
In a joint letter to
President Benigno Aquino III, the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry
(PCCI), Alyansa Agrikultura, Chamber of Mines of the Philippines (COMP),
Employers Confederation of the Philippines (ECOP), Philippine Exporters
Confederation (Philexport), Semiconductor and Electronics Industries of the
Philippines (SEIPI), American Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines (AmCham),
European Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines (ECCP) and the Korean Chamber
of Commerce of the Philippines (KCCP pointed out the importance of having a
clear program for achieving reasonable and competitive power rates as key to
accelerating industrialization, bringing in significant foreign direct
investments, creating employment opportunities and realizing sustainable and
inclusive economic growth.
The joint
Philippine business group and foreign chambers said private sector is ready and
enthused to support actions to resolve the situation, but there is that need
for the national leadership to clearly define the national policy and strategic
objectives concerning the two critical issues of power supply sustainability
and reliability and regional competitive power tariff. They said this should include reasonable
target timing and accountability.
The group emphasized that the DOE should not be left
alone to figure out the solutions but for the entire Economic Cluster to act as
one team in evaluating the situation and strategizing on how to achieve these
goals. They said the Economic Cluster
should be able to respond to the challenges
with a broader perspective and mindset giving full consideration of the real
and apparent successful strategies of the Philippines’ neighboring countries in
the region in terms of enhancing the business environment by providing more
competitive power rates. They also
pointed out to the importance of fair competition towards achieve the goals of
power security and competitive rate.
Specifically,
the business organizations submitted the following long-term recommendations:
On power supply security
1.
A national power
supply roadmap specifying, among other things, the required power plants, their
configurations (fuel type, size, etc.), locations, and schedule of operations
2.
A supporting power
supply agreement (PSA) template that will be adopted by all distribution
utilities (DUs) as classified and qualified
3.
A regular and
transparent power supply bidding process that will cover base load, peaking,
and reserves
On competition
1.
Developing programs
and processes that ensure fair and transparent competition among stakeholders
in the supply side, where the final major stakeholders do not number more than
five and are also partners among themselves or with DU stakeholders in other
major industrial ventures in the country
2.
Increasing the
market power of various DUs in order to create fair competition and increase
power supply security
On competitive power rates
1.
Fostering closer
coordination among economic, fiscal, industrial, and energy sectors to develop
a competitive tariff sweet spot
2.
Bringing the
regulatory sector to the same table in order to address the impression that
there is a lack of coordination among planners and implementers
On implementation
1.
Developing a strong
public-private coordinating task force to provide leadership in promoting the
program and overcoming anxiety or resistance from LGUs and civil sectors
2.
The task force to
clear the way for the efficient implementation of the program (e.g., LGU
permitting, licensing, etc.)
In the mid-term, the joint
business group called for the following:
1.
Creation of a
forward market[1]by requiring distribution utilities (DUs) to contract 100
percent of their forecast energy requirements for the next three years and no
less than 90 percent for seven years thereafter, subjecting these to
competitive public auctions;
2.
Creation of a
forward market and the establishment of such either at the Wholesale
Electricity Spot Market (WESM) or under a trading platform operated by industry
stakeholders and duly accredited by the private sector, subject to market rules
prescribed by the DOE;
3.
Creation of an
ancillary reserve market by requiring the National Grid Corporation of the
Philippines (NGCP) to secure firm contracts for ancillary services; and,
4.
Streamlining
business permit and licensing systems to facilitate generation project
development and early commissioning of badly needed additional capacity.
The
business organizations concluded that the EPIRA provides government enough
arsenal to improve processes and policies that will pave the way for the
implementation of programs addressing the issues of power supply and cost. They cautioned that amending the law will only cause uncertainties that will
slow down the progress of new investment and projects in the power generation
sector and ultimately further delay the gains that the EPIRA was envisioned to
bring.
Whenever there is talk of
amending EPIRA, banks and investors put on hold the evaluation of power
projects. Potential changes or amendments to the EPIRA could materially
change the risks or upset financial projections on the viability of high-cost
power projects.
[1]A forward contract is an agreement between DUs
and generators for the supply
of a fixed quantity of electricity at a pre-agreed period within the year at an
agreed fixed price. A forward contract mitigates the price volatility of
replacement power from the WESM and allows supply gaps from PSAs during maintenance to be filled
without speculative pricing (if generators are otherwise required to include in
their power rate the replacement power cost during maintenance outage).
Comments
Post a Comment