WE are all familiar with that gospel lesson that those who have
been blessed and gifted much, much is also expected and demanded. “Much will be
required of the person entrusted with much, and still more will be demanded of
the person entrusted with more.” (Lk 12,48)
This sounds commonsensical enough. We don’t have to argue about
it. The problem is how to apply this rule to specific situations and how to
‘quantify’ the ‘much’ involved in what is given and what is demanded.
Considering the way the world is now, plunged as it is in confusion,
ignorance, error, if not in sin, perversions and other anomalies—all this in
spite of the many advances in many fields of our life—getting to know the
answers to these questions is like looking for a needle in a haystack.
Take the case of the controversy arising from the recently concluded
synod on the family. There is definitely a need to reach out to people in some
difficult situations, like those who are divorced and remarried and still would
want to be faithful Catholics, or those with homosexual tendencies who want to
be true to their Christian faith.
This is not to mention that we need to reach out to them even
if they do not want to be faithful. They are usually referred to as ‘the weak
and the lost’ or the ‘unchurched,’ the ‘uncatechized,’ etc. If we have to
follow Christ closely, we have to have that attitude.
But, in the first place, there are some of those affected who
do not even acknowledge there’s something wrong with them. As if there is
anyone in this planet, whether in regular marital status or not, whether
straight or not, who is completely free of anything wrong. Who to deal with
these people, and how, is a question needing clear answers.
The same question, of course, can be poised with respect to
those who acknowledge their predicament. It’s not an easy question to answer,
since not just anyone can do it for sheer lack of pertinent skills, aptitude if
not of spirituality. People with the appropriate gifts should do it, people who
are strong enough to carry the weak.
In general terms, we perhaps can say that the clergy should
lead the way in dealing with this challenge. After all, they (we, me included)
with their sacramental priesthood have certainly been given much in terms of
grace and training, and they are in touch with just about everyone, at least in
theory.
But can we really say that they are generally trained for this?
We just have to take a quick look around and see clearly that, first of all,
they are not enough to handle this situation. Then, they are burdened with all
sorts of duties, responsibilities and tasks.
Then, they simply cannot go far beyond giving generic reminders
and suggestions. As far as I know, many of them are not trained to handle
counselling and spiritual direction. There’s even a big problem about
encouraging them to sit in confessionals to hear confessions.
And with these faithful who have to be reached out, what is
needed is special, personalized attention. They just cannot be given the normal
things, for the simple reason that they are not yet in the proper condition.
They need a lot of talking, clarification, encouragement, counselling,
spiritual direction, etc.
Our Church leaders should come up with appropriate structures
and programs to tackle this challenge—but structures that are properly animated
with the true spirit of God, and not just purely human structures and programs
that just can be turned on and off at one’s convenience.
We can already make use of the many groups which, animated with
a certain charism, are doing some pastoral work. These are the charismatic
groups, the Basic Ecclesial Communities, and other organizations apostolic in
character. Schools, too, can be tapped.
The laity, more than the clergy, to my mind would be most appropriate
to carry out this task. They are spread out all over and can easily get in
touch and journey with these people in special conditions. They therefore have
to be properly motivated and trained. Their competence to do this task should
be clear.
It’s quite obvious that for this concern to be effective, the
dealings have to be based on real friendship and confidence. They just cannot
be done in a professional or clinical level.
It might be good to revisit the points articulated in the ‘Familiaris
consortio’ of St. John Paul II to give us a clear idea of how to deal with
special cases.
Comments
Post a Comment