TO be sure, that’s the law that should govern us who, being
created in the image and likeness of God who is love, are meant to love and for
love. In short, love is the be-all and end-all of our life and our whole being.
Short of that, we are actually not living as we ought to live.
That’s why when Christ was asked what the
greatest commandment was—read, what does God really want us to do—he replied very
clearly: it is to love God with everything that we are and have, and to love
our neighbour as ourselves.
Later on, he
perfected that divine imperative by giving us a new commandment, and that is
that we have to love one another as he himself has loved us. Christ, who
declared himself to be our way, our truth and our life, is the standard of the
love we ought to have.
He is the
giver and author of that love, the very pattern as well as the goal of that
love. A love that does not come from him, or does not have at least some
semblance of that love, albeit unwittingly held by us, is not true love.
We need to
do everything to be able to love as Christ himself loves us. It is a love that
has clear do’s and don’ts, although it is also a love full of mercy and
compassion. It’s a love that perfectly blends truth and charity, justice and
mercy and compassion, and is capable of being consistent despite the changing circumstances
of place and time.
In this
regard, it might be good to review the doctrine on the ‘law of gradualness’ as
contrasted to the ‘gradualness of the law’ in order to have a good idea of how
this love with clear content that is exclusive can be made compatible also with
the demands of mercy and compassion that are inclusive.
This is now
a relevant and urgent point worth considering given the fact the papacy of Pope
Francis whose thrust is mercy and compassion is trying to delineate the grey
areas where truth and charity are at play, where justice and mercy and
compassion have to blend.
The ‘law of
gradualness’ means that we have to have a decisive break with sin while leading
a progressive path toward a total union with God’s will and his loving demands.
It’s a gradual process with a clear idea of what sin is. In this law, we don’t
deny the objectivity and gravity of sin, even as we try our best to grapple with
it in varying degrees.
The “gradualness of the law” implies that the objectivity of the sin
and its gravity may vary according to one’s subjective understanding of it or
of his condition and circumstances at a given moment.
It is a
total subordination of the objective to the subjective. A sin may be a sin or
not, its gravity grave or not, depending totally on how one sees it or on how
his condition would grapple with it.
This is not
right. While it’s true that subjectivity has a say on the gravity of sin, it cannot
redefine the objectivity of sin. Sin is sin irrespective of one’s knowledge and
awareness of it or not.
But it’s also true that pastoral and
disciplinary aspects of the morality of our human acts, especially our sinful
acts, would somehow be adapted to the circumstances of the person, and of time
and place, etc.
This is
where a continuing assessment of things ought to be done especially by our
Church leaders with the participation of as wide a contributor of people as
possible.
Our
estimation of the love that Christ wants for us will always be a work in
progress especially in its pastoral and disciplinary aspects. We can never say
that we already have it so perfectly that we do not need anymore to make any
improvement or refinement.
Let’s remember that our pastoral and
disciplinary laws and ways, no matter how effective they may be in a given
period of time or in a given place, are at best human estimations that will
always be in need of updating, adapting, revising, modifying, enriching, etc.
They will always remain human, and as such will always have changeable parts
though there are also permanent and absolute parts.
This is, I
think, what Pope Francis is trying to do with his insistent call for more mercy
and compassion to those who need to be better treated by updated pastoral and
disciplinary laws.
Comments
Post a Comment